Skip to main content

As it is: Democracy

    Let me clarify. This is not an attempt to define the concept of democracy, nor a prose to discuss what it was meant to be or what it ought to be. This is simply about what democracy is - out there, everywhere, as observed and applied. Okay? Alright. Let's go. 

    Humans are dramatic animals. We are not comfortable being true to ourselves. Everything has to be enveloped in a sweet narrative. We developed the narrative of legitimacy to license power. Democracy is a part of this narrative of legitimacy. In other words, democracy is an explanation we love to hear about how the powerful acquired power in the first place. So far as power is gained by a process deemed democratic, most of us feel safe, secure, and cradled in the nectar of  human wellness. Beyond that, it is nothing. Okay, one value notion may be added; but only because it is out there (to some extent): requirement for majority (not really). 

    So how does it all work together - democracy as requirement for majority, and legitimization of power? It mostly depends on the specifics of the structure within which power has been devised. Yet, much is the same. With legitimate and political power up for grab, the socially dominant organize themselves into factions. This is done to ensure that the powerless never attain any effective say, and sold with the narrative of efficiency. Each faction reaches out to the masses and narrates whatever the people are out to buy. Before the social media boom, it was difficult to gauge their shopping list. Now, social media does not only reflect their 'wishlist', but also designs and drafts it. So any need to gauge the people's need is thrown out the window. Further, majority is not merely about the people; inter-institutional comity also comes into play. That is it?

    Oh yes - those who legitimize power. They have their alternative narratives to choose from. Periodically, they are presented with altered forms of these narratives, and they make their choice. The faction that gets the majority (not necessarily; alright, not always; depends you know; alright - the one who is chosen by the larger number of people; again, not necessarily; just leave it!) receives the license to power. Having given the license, democracy waits - till the next elections or any subsequent political creativity. And the people return to whatever they were doing (obviously after posting that mandatory picture with a glorious repetition of whatever they have bought from the narrative of democracy and their faction). 

   This is not the conceptual content of democracy? Sure, it isn't. Pretty nihilistic? Surely! If you have the eyes, aspects of reality carry some nihilism. This is not what democracy is supposed to be? Maybe! Who knows what the state formative text means when it aspires to have a democratic state! There might be more to democracy as it is - but this is what is visible. There might be more to see, but who has the bandwidth!

     

Popular posts from this blog

The Second Self

Aristotle once described a friend as a “second self,” and I feel that love, in its truest essence, surpasses even this. When one experience such a bond, the one they love receives the same care and dignity that they grant their inner self. Another way to put it: "There is no distinction between how I treat myself and how I treat them; both dwell within the same sanctuary. To harm or disrespect them would be to attack at my own essence. To invade their space or violate their being would be no different than self-betrayal." Love, when it flows from this depth does not seek to diminish either, but instead unite both in the integrity of one soul. And yet, when suspicion arises where only reverence thrives, it pierces deeply. It is a unique kind of hurt, not because devotion falters, but because words seem powerless to explain what is so certain within: "I cannot and will not harm you. You are too intertwined with my very core; harming you would be self-destruction. It create...
Read more

No attraction without intellectual intimidation

So what is it that makes someone attractive?  I mean, it is only a fleeting biological urge that turns a head – a spark that flashes and fades in a moment. But then there is another kind of attraction — the kind where a single set of eyes become the only reality in an ocean of people. They have a pull so magnetic that the sense of self willingly surrenders, eager to submerge itself entirely. This is not mere infatuation; this is nothing like the experience of romantic love. Unlike the usual relationship urges – which are controlling, obsessive and largely selfish – this is complete and utter devotion. What makes someone ‘ that ’ attractive? How does a person become so vital to your being that they become impervious to the doctrine of severability —where to remove them from your memory would be to strike down the very foundation of who you have become? I mean to say that even when they are not with you, they move with you constantly like a physical absence in your being. I suppo...
Read more

An Interest in Nothingness

We distinguish between ' an interest in nothingness ' and ' an interest in nothing at all '. The latter feels no call at all - neither from existence nor from the non-existent, not from the visible or the invisible. No internal or external pull (or push) moves him. This is a disinterested apathetic person moving through life in a state which could be written off (by some) as anhedonia.  The other - i.e., the ones interested in nothingness - do not suffer the lack of the ' pull '. Their object of attraction, however, is the transcendental - formless, attribute-less, timeless, and even witless. This pull is a way in which the search for the absolute truth expresses itself in our heads. It generates an obsession with  निर्गुण,  निराकार, and  निर्विकार. Why (and how) does one develop a taste for such unmentionables could be fertile field of inquiry, but I'll dare not foray lest bitter realizations arise to haunt me! But such tendencies sure have larger consequen...
Read more