Skip to main content

हम हैं ना

 

I do not use that word – love (too misunderstood, damned, and misused). However, err not. Being an aspirational member of Dumbledore’s Army, and a lifelong adherent of the Swanson Code – ‘If you don’t believe in love, what’s the point of living?’ – it is just the word with which I have issues, not what it is supposed to convey. (Again, I do not mean what people generally use it to convey – desire, or want, or all the ‘ships’ being shipped nowadays.) Also, I won’t tell you how I would define love – because I would not! Some things – law, life, love, duty – are निभाने के लिए (I could not better convey it in this language). These are borne by acceptance, dedication and devotion, not by definition. As it is, the very challenge is to seek (or come across most unexpectedly) a person for whom the soul instinctively and effortlessly scooches to make space, as if it always belonged to them (and you never knew that the said space existed before you met them).

Chalo! What was this supposed to be about? Yes – the content of ‘love’ (because you won’t take another word for it) beyond selfish wants. One way it appears is in the form of a desire for self-improvement. When the soul moves to scooch, it looks around. It finds how you’ve been keeping yourself in a dark and dingy space. The soul rebels – Have I been living here! It exhorts – (Mohit Chauhan sings it better) यहाँ रहने आएगी, दिल सजा लूँ, मैं ख़्वाब थोड़े से बुन लूँ…Your cynicism, indolence, and apathy; your explosive anger, fruitless drama, and general insolence – all your ills become visible to you (magnified). You have been living in it for long, but scooching shook your existence, and opened your eyes to your reality. You stare at yourself in disgust – this is not where I’ll let my loved ones reside. You clean, and clean, and clean. And you feel better (love, hence, returns your sanity). This, I feel, is the first response – an internal revolution. This undictated and internal will to improve is the first proof.

And what else? A lot! But I won’t say all that here. Somethings are too precious to express. Rather, expression is a tricky thing. Somethings are for anyone, some for most we know, others for a close few, and then there’s an immeasurable ton for one for whom we instinctively scooch – for whom we wish to constantly say - हम हैं ना…

 

Popular posts from this blog

The Second Self

Aristotle once described a friend as a “second self,” and I feel that love, in its truest essence, surpasses even this. When one experience such a bond, the one they love receives the same care and dignity that they grant their inner self. Another way to put it: "There is no distinction between how I treat myself and how I treat them; both dwell within the same sanctuary. To harm or disrespect them would be to attack at my own essence. To invade their space or violate their being would be no different than self-betrayal." Love, when it flows from this depth does not seek to diminish either, but instead unite both in the integrity of one soul. And yet, when suspicion arises where only reverence thrives, it pierces deeply. It is a unique kind of hurt, not because devotion falters, but because words seem powerless to explain what is so certain within: "I cannot and will not harm you. You are too intertwined with my very core; harming you would be self-destruction. It create...

Boo! Marriage...

     I am a PhD scholar. This means that I am in a constant state of anxiety and guilt. Pouring my thoughts here aggravates that guilt because these thoughts have nothing to do with my thesis. This is about marriage. Having recently turned 31 and graduating to the social position of a Senior Bachelor (unlike other senior positions, this promotion grants a higher level of ostracization) I have a lot to say. Those happily (or sadly) married might disagree with what I have to say. I won't say everything here but express a handful of moorings. For what it is worth, these are just rants, not canonical truths (just pretending to be humble; yehi sab sach h!).       The search for a companion could proceed in broadly two ways: on your own, or search by parents. The first is (usually) a rather relaxed subconscious search, whereas the latter is a more fast-tracked intentional browsing. The first has no method (and is therefore deemed 'mad' by social conventions)...

An Interest in Nothingness

We distinguish between ' an interest in nothingness ' and ' an interest in nothing at all '. The latter feels no call at all - neither from existence nor from the non-existent, not from the visible or the invisible. No internal or external pull (or push) moves him. This is a disinterested apathetic person moving through life in a state which could be written off (by some) as anhedonia.  The other - i.e., the ones interested in nothingness - do not suffer the lack of the ' pull '. Their object of attraction, however, is the transcendental - formless, attribute-less, timeless, and even witless. This pull is a way in which the search for the absolute truth expresses itself in our heads. It generates an obsession with  निर्गुण,  निराकार, and  निर्विकार. Why (and how) does one develop a taste for such unmentionables could be fertile field of inquiry, but I'll dare not foray lest bitter realizations arise to haunt me! But such tendencies sure have larger consequen...