Skip to main content

What we learn from the Krogans? - Not the ones from Mass Effect

All praise Ninny of the Nonny! 

I have watched a considerable number of superhero movies, and received much criticism from the 14th Lords of Grammar who constantly tell me its "lay-miz-eh-RAH-bluh"! Well, unlike them I've actually read the book. So they can take their large coffee mugs and do something with it.

Ah! Yes... the superhero movies - chicken soup for the lonely souls (make it daal ka paani for us bimar vegetarians). Behind the capes, armours and impossible powers (married to ridiculous physics), they operate on the shared ground of human suffering. All of them attempt to explore what it actually means to give oneself up for others.

Their premise is rooted in philosophical ideas of suffering, pain, empathy, love and sacrifice. It seems to me that the capacity for true sacrifice is rooted in the capacity to endure pain. A soul that endures a certain amount of suffering expands beyond its ego. It creates space to absorb an immense amount of agony, instilling the virtue of empathy. From the depths of empathy flows love. This is not the obsessive, transactional romantic love born of convenience, but an agape love—a profound, unconditional devotion to humanity itself. (For an understanding of love beyond its bastardised form seen in Bollywood movies or felt in 'relationships', see C S Lewis, The Four Loves

It is this specific love that acts as the spring of sacrifice - a concept hollowed out by those in power. Politicians and administrators frequently speak of glorious purposes, demanding the masses lay down their lives, their comforts, and their futures on the altar of some grand design. At the same time, they build impenetrable fortresses around themselves, safely insulated from the consequences of their own dictates. This is not sacrifice; they legislate pain into the lives of the people.

Sacrifice is not commanded from a podium or through a mail; it is chosen in the depths of the heart. It is intrinsic. It is Logan, enduring the crushing heartbreak of striking down Jean because it is the only way to save the world from her uncontrollable fire. It is Peter Parker, willingly erasing his own existence from the memories of every person he loves, condemning himself to isolation so that they might have a safe future. It is Tony Stark, feeling the fatal, cosmic surge of the Infinity Stones, knowing the cost, and paying it without hesitation. It is Steve Rogers, plunging the aircraft into the icy, lonely depths to spare a city. It is Cal - a father, broken and desperate - taking the life of the woman he loved so his daughter, Skye (he would have called her Daisy), would not have to bear the soul-destroying weight of doing it herself. “You don't have to bear this pain,” he tells her. “I will.”

That is the essence of sacrifice. It is the realization that one's capacity to carry suffering is so vast, that they refuse to let that suffering touch anyone else. You understand the devastating cost of pain, and the thought of another person bearing that agony becomes worse than bearing it yourself. You do not ask them to carry the weight; you step forward and take the cross upon your own shoulders, choosing to break your own self so that the people you love might remain whole. 

Popular posts from this blog

The Second Self

Aristotle once described a friend as a “second self,” and I feel that love, in its truest essence, surpasses even this. When one experience such a bond, the one they love receives the same care and dignity that they grant their inner self. Another way to put it: "There is no distinction between how I treat myself and how I treat them; both dwell within the same sanctuary. To harm or disrespect them would be to attack at my own essence. To invade their space or violate their being would be no different than self-betrayal." Love, when it flows from this depth does not seek to diminish either, but instead unite both in the integrity of one soul. And yet, when suspicion arises where only reverence thrives, it pierces deeply. It is a unique kind of hurt, not because devotion falters, but because words seem powerless to explain what is so certain within: "I cannot and will not harm you. You are too intertwined with my very core; harming you would be self-destruction. It create...

No attraction without intellectual intimidation

So what is it that makes someone attractive?  I mean, it is only a fleeting biological urge that turns a head – a spark that flashes and fades in a moment. But then there is another kind of attraction — the kind where a single set of eyes become the only reality in an ocean of people. They have a pull so magnetic that the sense of self willingly surrenders, eager to submerge itself entirely. This is not mere infatuation; this is nothing like the experience of romantic love. Unlike the usual relationship urges – which are controlling, obsessive and largely selfish – this is complete and utter devotion. What makes someone ‘ that ’ attractive? How does a person become so vital to your being that they become impervious to the doctrine of severability —where to remove them from your memory would be to strike down the very foundation of who you have become? I mean to say that even when they are not with you, they move with you constantly like a physical absence in your being. I suppo...

An Interest in Nothingness

We distinguish between ' an interest in nothingness ' and ' an interest in nothing at all '. The latter feels no call at all - neither from existence nor from the non-existent, not from the visible or the invisible. No internal or external pull (or push) moves him. This is a disinterested apathetic person moving through life in a state which could be written off (by some) as anhedonia.  The other - i.e., the ones interested in nothingness - do not suffer the lack of the ' pull '. Their object of attraction, however, is the transcendental - formless, attribute-less, timeless, and even witless. This pull is a way in which the search for the absolute truth expresses itself in our heads. It generates an obsession with  निर्गुण,  निराकार, and  निर्विकार. Why (and how) does one develop a taste for such unmentionables could be fertile field of inquiry, but I'll dare not foray lest bitter realizations arise to haunt me! But such tendencies sure have larger consequen...