Skip to main content

No attraction without intellectual intimidation

So what is it that makes someone attractive? 

I mean, it is only a fleeting biological urge that turns a head – a spark that flashes and fades in a moment. But then there is another kind of attraction — the kind where a single set of eyes become the only reality in an ocean of people. They have a pull so magnetic that the sense of self willingly surrenders, eager to submerge itself entirely. This is not mere infatuation; this is nothing like the experience of romantic love. Unlike the usual relationship urges – which are controlling, obsessive and largely selfish – this is complete and utter devotion.

What makes someone ‘that’ attractive? How does a person become so vital to your being that they become impervious to the doctrine of severability—where to remove them from your memory would be to strike down the very foundation of who you have become? I mean to say that even when they are not with you, they move with you constantly like a physical absence in your being.

I suppose the answer could be found in a proposition similar to that universal rule of taxation: “no attraction without intellectual intimidation.” Yet this intimidation has nothing to do with who holds more knowledge or who can win a debate, or a comparison of academic prowess. This intimidation is born of a profound emotional and existential intelligence in the other. It is the awe of watching someone navigate the messy, abstract, and unpredictable currents of life with an effortless grace.

Maybe we are devastatingly drawn to those who possess the peace we must work ruthlessly to achieve. For a mind that is constantly churning—forever analyzing, deconstructing, and battling its own internal friction in the pursuit of clarity—watching her handle with ease the very things that cause you anxiety is not just impressive. It is deeply soothing. She becomes a psychological safe harbor. You are not just attracted to her; you are moved by her way of being in the world. Maybe we feel devotion towards people who elevate our understanding of what it means to be human.

When a person introduces you to an entirely new way of experiencing the world, they do not just leave memories when they go; they leave a permanent imprint on your psychology. They become the lens through which you continue to view life. The deep ache of missing her exists – heavy and undeniable – but it rests right alongside the pure, profound gratitude of having known her. The pain of the absence is slightly softened by the sheer joy of the encounter.

​And yes! One more thing…the eyes! It is why centuries of songs and poetry are helplessly devoted to a single gaze. Because a look is sufficient to bind your soul in a spell you never wish to break. They are eyes that blind you to the noise of absolutely everything else, burning steadily as the only truth left in the world. When the mind is finally quietened by someone’s presence, the eyes are where that silent, undivided devotion is communicated.

Popular posts from this blog

The Second Self

Aristotle once described a friend as a “second self,” and I feel that love, in its truest essence, surpasses even this. When one experience such a bond, the one they love receives the same care and dignity that they grant their inner self. Another way to put it: "There is no distinction between how I treat myself and how I treat them; both dwell within the same sanctuary. To harm or disrespect them would be to attack at my own essence. To invade their space or violate their being would be no different than self-betrayal." Love, when it flows from this depth does not seek to diminish either, but instead unite both in the integrity of one soul. And yet, when suspicion arises where only reverence thrives, it pierces deeply. It is a unique kind of hurt, not because devotion falters, but because words seem powerless to explain what is so certain within: "I cannot and will not harm you. You are too intertwined with my very core; harming you would be self-destruction. It create...

An Interest in Nothingness

We distinguish between ' an interest in nothingness ' and ' an interest in nothing at all '. The latter feels no call at all - neither from existence nor from the non-existent, not from the visible or the invisible. No internal or external pull (or push) moves him. This is a disinterested apathetic person moving through life in a state which could be written off (by some) as anhedonia.  The other - i.e., the ones interested in nothingness - do not suffer the lack of the ' pull '. Their object of attraction, however, is the transcendental - formless, attribute-less, timeless, and even witless. This pull is a way in which the search for the absolute truth expresses itself in our heads. It generates an obsession with  निर्गुण,  निराकार, and  निर्विकार. Why (and how) does one develop a taste for such unmentionables could be fertile field of inquiry, but I'll dare not foray lest bitter realizations arise to haunt me! But such tendencies sure have larger consequen...