Skip to main content

No one listens

     I have a decent vantage point. I see that nobody listens to anyone. Let me clarify. I do not mean that one does not do as the other says; there is hardly any resistance there. Comply, you must; right! I only mean that they do not participate by listening; that no one lends their ears. Now, before you bring me to disrepute by imagining that I am engaging in a social conversation, and pointing out some evil being practiced; stop! Social interventions are so 20th century. As a good observer, I believe everything I see. And I trust that everything happens for good (another pipe dream of the simpletons). So, it is good that no one listens; rather, there isn't any need for listening. 

     A bloke takes birth, and falls into a web of relationships. A substantial portion of life is spent among them. You know everyone around you. It is a gift of these years of interaction that you no longer need to listen. It takes hard work and time to form a mental image of the persons surrounding you. Trust the image, ignore the person. You gave them enough time for pouring their characteristics before you. So when you see their mouths moving, switch to that mental image you have saved in your head. Trust me, their irritating voices won't catch your ears. You will experience a soothing tranquility. What could a mother, sister, father, wife, husband, child, have to say? You already know! Why hear them out? A blabbering partner is surely taking you on a guilt trip. Ignore the voices; satiate them with a sultry sorry, and move on. A jabbering child is unnecessarily complaining of imagined troubles she calls "depression". That one is surely lured by the mental health revolutionaries (and we know revolutions are so 18th century), and deserves nothing but a healthy dose of "don't overthink", "make friends", or if you really wish to push their buttons, "get a life". Why should you bother yourself with such nonsense? You know them, you know the replies; stop listening. 

     Even at work, at school, or with friends and strangers, the need to listen never arises. You are never going to do that work anyway; so there is no need to hear how it is to be done. The teacher might drone on for hours. Ignore them; as it is any non-billionaire ought not to say a word to you. These teachers will either give incorrect lectures on irrelevant ideas, or, worse, they'll educate you and help you think. Again, we know that education and thinking is so 19th century. We live in the 21st century, and this is a post-truth, post-knowledge, and post-reality world! Over to friends and strangers: they are one and the same. You have known a person belonging to that class, caste, religion, or sex, right? Your work is done! Just use the pre-existing images to help you with these obstructions to your individualism. 

    There was a western philosopher, or scientist, or sociologist, I don't know. He rejected to read anything that was not his own writing. He did this in order to maintain his "cerebral hygiene". He might have spent his years in an asylum, and died in poverty, but that is never going to happen to you. So, follow his advice. Stop listening, because nobody listens.

Popular posts from this blog

The Second Self

Aristotle once described a friend as a “second self,” and I feel that love, in its truest essence, surpasses even this. When one experience such a bond, the one they love receives the same care and dignity that they grant their inner self. Another way to put it: "There is no distinction between how I treat myself and how I treat them; both dwell within the same sanctuary. To harm or disrespect them would be to attack at my own essence. To invade their space or violate their being would be no different than self-betrayal." Love, when it flows from this depth does not seek to diminish either, but instead unite both in the integrity of one soul. And yet, when suspicion arises where only reverence thrives, it pierces deeply. It is a unique kind of hurt, not because devotion falters, but because words seem powerless to explain what is so certain within: "I cannot and will not harm you. You are too intertwined with my very core; harming you would be self-destruction. It create...

No attraction without intellectual intimidation

So what is it that makes someone attractive?  I mean, it is only a fleeting biological urge that turns a head – a spark that flashes and fades in a moment. But then there is another kind of attraction — the kind where a single set of eyes become the only reality in an ocean of people. They have a pull so magnetic that the sense of self willingly surrenders, eager to submerge itself entirely. This is not mere infatuation; this is nothing like the experience of romantic love. Unlike the usual relationship urges – which are controlling, obsessive and largely selfish – this is complete and utter devotion. What makes someone ‘ that ’ attractive? How does a person become so vital to your being that they become impervious to the doctrine of severability —where to remove them from your memory would be to strike down the very foundation of who you have become? I mean to say that even when they are not with you, they move with you constantly like a physical absence in your being. I suppo...

An Interest in Nothingness

We distinguish between ' an interest in nothingness ' and ' an interest in nothing at all '. The latter feels no call at all - neither from existence nor from the non-existent, not from the visible or the invisible. No internal or external pull (or push) moves him. This is a disinterested apathetic person moving through life in a state which could be written off (by some) as anhedonia.  The other - i.e., the ones interested in nothingness - do not suffer the lack of the ' pull '. Their object of attraction, however, is the transcendental - formless, attribute-less, timeless, and even witless. This pull is a way in which the search for the absolute truth expresses itself in our heads. It generates an obsession with  निर्गुण,  निराकार, and  निर्विकार. Why (and how) does one develop a taste for such unmentionables could be fertile field of inquiry, but I'll dare not foray lest bitter realizations arise to haunt me! But such tendencies sure have larger consequen...